Updates, resources and impressions related to my pilgrimage in mission and missiology in Croatia and Central and Eastern Europe as a sign, that God still moves in a mysterious way, His wonders to perform!
Showing posts with label CEEAMS. Show all posts
Showing posts with label CEEAMS. Show all posts
Monday, March 14, 2016
Friday, February 20, 2015
Kerk zijn in Midden en Oost Europa, 25 jaar na de val van het ijzeren gordijn - CEEAMS 2015
De jaarlijkse conferentie van de Central and
Eastern European Association for Mission Studies (Midden- en Oost-Europese
Vereniging van Missiologie) (CEEAMS) werd gehouden in Heiligenkreuz, in de
buurt van Wenen van 10-13 februari 2015. Het thema: “Voorbij het IJzeren
Gordijn: Kerk zijn in Midden- en Oost-Europa vijfentwintig jaar na de politieke
veranderingen”.
De deelnemers, voornamelijk afkomstig uit de regio, vertelden
verhalen van christenen die wonen en werken in die regio en analyseerden de
trends in kerk en zending na de gedenkwaardige gebeurtenissen van 1989.
CEEAMS is opgericht in 2002 en is een
internationale en interkerkelijke organisatie die zich inzet voor de
wetenschappelijke studie van vraagstukken van christelijke zending in Midden-
en Oost-Europa. Het doel is om de plaatselijke gemeenten te ondersteunen, te
versterken en toe te rusten om als open en gastvrije gemeenschappen te
functioneren en te getuigen van Jezus Christus in de wereld van vandaag.
De organisatoren van de conferentie waren er
vooral op gericht de gebeurtenissen van de 25 jaar grondig te analyseren. Het 'IJzeren
Gordijn‘ heeft Europa meer dan vier decennia verdeeld in West en Oost.
Christelijke gemeenschappen van beide kanten werden uitgedaagd om te gaan met
de realiteit van grenzen van prikkeldraad. Daarom ook had de val van het
communistische systeem gevolgen voor zowel Oost en West. De val van het IJzeren
Gordijn betekent niet dat het is verdwenen zoals de verroeste stukken het leven
van degenen die erop stappen blijft beïnvloeden.
Doel van deze conferentie was om
theologen-missiologen een kans te bieden om na te denken over de vragen hoe en
op welke wijze de communistische ervaringen het leven van de christelijke
gemeenschappen in Midden- en Oost-Europa (MOE) blijven beïnvloeden en wat het
betekent om kerk te zijn of te worden in de post-1989/1990 periode.
Vaak wordt alleen aandacht gegeven aan de
veranderingen in de voormalige communistische landen. In deze conferentie werd er van uit gegaan dat zowel het
westen als het oosten met de overblijfselen van het IJzeren Gordijn te maken
hebben. Daarom is het ook belangrijk om samen na te denken over de complexiteiten
die het leven, de positie en de gestalte van de christelijke gemeenschappen in Midden-
en Oost- Europa in de afgelopen vijfentwintig jaar gevormd hebben. Het doel van
de conferentie was om theologen-missiologen, Master- en PhD-studenten die zich
bezighouden met onderzoek in zendingswetenschap als ook geïnteresseerde kerkelijk
werkers en gemeenteleden uit verschillende confessionele achtergronden samen te
brengen.
Maar deze grondige analyse ging niet voorbij aan de
praktische consequenties. Elke spreker werd aangemoedigd de betekenis van deze
verhalen en analyse voor het huidige en toekomstige missionaire werk van de
kerk in Midden- en Oost-Europa te verhelderen. De toon werd gezet in de eerste
twee lezingen gegeven op dinsdagavond en woensdagochtend. Deze sessies maakten
duidelijk wat de fundamentele benadering van deze conferentie was, nl. een persoonlijke
en praxis georiënteerde benadering.
Er wordt gezegd dat alle theologie uiteindelijk
biografisch is. Om dit te onderstrepen werd de conferentie geopend door Prof.
Dr. Peter Penner die zijn pelgrimstocht in zending beschreef vanaf zijn
geboorte als een etnische Duitser in Kazachstan, op dat moment nog deel van de
Sovjet-Unie. Als tiener verhuisde hij met zijn familie naar Duitsland. Sinds
zijn studie theologie in Duitsland heeft hij aantal leidinggevende posities vervuld
aan theologische instellingen en werd zo bekend als een toonaangevende missioloog
in Midden- en Oost-Europa. Deze persoonlijke benadering werd gevolgd door
latere sprekers.
De tweede fundamentele benadering werd uiteengezet
door Prof. Dr. Anne-Marie Kool. Zij voerde aan dat in de theologie en
missiologie er vaak een sterke tweedeling is tussen theorie en praktijk. Aan de
ene kant kan de theologie en de theologische opleiding op het abstracte niveau gericht
blijven, en wordt er geen verband gelegd met de context. Op deze manier kan de
theologie dus niet relevant zijn voor het praktische kerkelijke en missionaire leven.
Aan de andere kant kan in het zendingswerk gemakkelijk voorbij gegaan worden
aan het belang om kritisch te reflecteren op het zendingswerk in het licht van
het evangelie. Missiologie moet beginnen met het verstaan van de context waarin
we leven, en vervolgens de vragen die de context opwerpt tegen het licht van het
evangelie houden en kritisch reflecteren op de context vanuit een
bijbels-theologisch perspectief. De andere sprekers volgden deze aanpak min of
meer op de voet.
In het licht van deze persoonlijke en praktijk
gerichte benadering, volgde na elke lezing een stevige discussie en debat over de
thema’s die aan de orde waren. De presentaties gingen over uiteenlopende en
gevarieerde onderwerpen, maar waren allen gericht op hoe het de christelijke
kerk in de afgelopen 25 jaar was vergaan en hoe het zich zou moeten richten op de
toekomst.
Er zijn enkele interessante feiten op te merken.
De samenstelling van de deelnemersgroep was zeer uiteenlopend. Een derde van de
sprekers in de ochtendwijdingen en in de lezingen waren vrouwen; een
indrukwekkend aantal voor een missiologische conferentie! Er was ook een flink
aantal jongere sprekers (onder de 30). Ze kwamen uit verschillende
denominaties: protestantse, evangelische, Baptist, orthodoxe en rooms-katholiek.
De meerderheid was afkomstig uit Midden- en Oost-Europa, met daarnaast een
aantal deelnemers uit West-Europa. De dertig deelnemers vertegenwoordigden 13
verschillende nationaliteiten.
Niet alleen waren de sprekers gevarieerd, maar ook
de contexten waarop werd gereflecteerd. Er waren lezingen over de gehele regio,
maar ook die gericht waren op verschillende landen: Rusland, Kirgizië,
Oekraïne, Bulgarije, Moldavië, Oost-Duitsland, Tsjechië, Slowakije, Roemenië en
Polen. Degenen die een lezing verzorgden hadden als kerkelijke achtergrond: orthodoxe,
rooms-katholieke, Baptisten, Lutherse, protestantse en Pinkster.
Afgezien van de grote verscheidenheid van
contexten, was er ook een grote verscheidenheid in de benaderingen van de
onderwerpen. De benaderingen omvatten statistische analyse, kritische
vergelijking en het gebruik van missiologisch modellen (Niebuhr's 'Christus en
cultuur ", de Pastorale Cirkel, kritische postmoderniteit en generationele
analyse).
Ten slotte was er ook een grote variatie in de
thema’s die bestudeerd werden. Onderwerpen varieerden van etnische minderheden /
religieuze ervaring en getuigen zijn, missiologisch zaken zoals missionair gemeente
zijn, pluralisme, sociaal engagement, missiologisch onderwijs en verhouding kerk
/ staat na 1989.
In deze conferentie kwam een veelheid aan thema’s
aan de orde, met een veelheid aan benaderingen, in de veelheid van contexten,
door een groot aantal sprekers, met een persoonlijke en praktijk gerichte
benadering. De reflectie was grondig, persoonlijk en praktisch. De deelnemers vertrokken
verrijkt door de ervaring van de lezingen en van het open gesprek. Ze hebben
ook de mogelijkheid om toegang te krijgen tot bibliografische materiaal, dat de
Kerken, zendingswerkers, en zendingsorganisaties zal helpen om zending in Midden-
en Oost-Europa te benaderen op een meer theologisch coherente manier en om meer
praktisch te worden toegerust om deze taak te vervullen.
Het is duidelijk dat onderzoek en discussie de
komende jaren moet worden voortgezet: er is nog heel veel onbewerkt terrein.
Neem voor meer informatie contact op met: Dr.
Dorottya Nagy (dorotti@hotmail.com)
Voor meer informatie over CEEAMS: www.ceeams.org
Saturday, March 23, 2013
Friday, June 15, 2012
A Norwegian attending the Writing Seminar Week writes...
Raymond Lillevik
PhD-student at Det Teologiske Menighetsfakultetet
(The Norwegian School of Theology) in Oslo
To Dr. A. M. Kool
Dear Dr. Kool.
I would like to thank you and your staff at the CIMS for your enthusiastic and competent guidance and assistance during my stay at the writing seminary at your center 11-15th June. During my research on Lichtenstein, Lucky and Gurland the last years, my experience is that it is very difficult to find the expertise as well as the necessary willingness to find and evaluate reliable material on Jewish believers in Jesus, and this has also been the case in regard to Eastern Europe. That is; until this week!
Not only have you, your staff and students dug up sources as sources and literature that previous has been inaccessible or unknown to me, but have also connected me to Hungarian researchers (like e.g. Dr. Kovács), organized meetings and journeys in that regard, and not least spent hours to help me to read Magyar. I will certainly recommend this center for fellow researchers at the Menighetsfakultetet as well as my supervisors, Prof. dr. Reidar Hvalvik and Prof. em. Dr. Oskar Skarsaune.
In Christ
Your Raymond Lillevik, June 15, 2012
Tuesday, April 3, 2012
Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Dr. Peter F. Penner defends with success habilitation thesis at Károli Gáspár Reformed University
Dr. Peter F. Penner defended yesterday with success his habilitation thesis: "Missionale Hermeneutik: Biblische Texte kontextuell und relevant lesen" (230 p.) at the Károli Gáspár University in the Reformed Church.
In two public lectures on Missional Hermeneutics: Its possible place in Biblical interpretation and Lokale Theologien, Kontextualisierung und die Rolle der Missionalen Hermeneutik he argued for the importance of reading scripture through a so-called "missional" lense. His main aim was to provide a corrective to a result-oriented, pragmatic missiology. On the question what contribution this approach provides to a new mission praxis he responded that it enables first of all a denominational dialogue, which is very important in the context of Central and Eastern Europe, where there is so much division and jealousy. It helps to focus on a "common mission praxis", because of the centrality of the concept of missio Dei. He continued that a missional hermeneutik also helps to focus on the Kingdom of God. Penner further argued that by reflecting on and evaluating what others have done in mission, and by assessing what the real issues are in the context of Central and Eastern Europe a new mission perspective for the church in mission could be born.
Examiner’s Report
1. Assessment of the thesis
Dr. Penner observes that since the World
Mission conference in Edinburgh 1910 significant changes have taken place in
the discipline of Missiology, influenced by developments in world history and
world Christianity. Not only the mission praxis, but also the theology of
mission underwent significant changes. The preparation and training for
missionaries focused almost exclusively on the praxis of mission as part of
practical theology, since the middle of the 20th century sociology and
anthropological studies were added to the curriculum, at the expense of the
biblical, historical and systematic theology disciplines. These developments
did not fail to impact the theological quality of the discipline of missiology
(pg. 1-3).
A strong tendency had come up in the praxis of
mission to focus on the quantitative result of mission and evangelism through
the church growth movement. The focus increasingly
turned to questions of culture and context which led to an awareness of the
variety of expressions of Christian faith, and sharp theological discussions on
what the concept and goal of mission is. As a result missiology today deals not
only with the praxis but also with the theology of mission (pg.3-4). The
churches in the “sogenannten Ostblock” have joined these missiological
discussions only recently.
These new developments in missiology led to a
focus on a contextual reading of the bible text. Previously a “biblical theology
of mission” used only selected biblical texts to define certain mission themes
from a biblical perspective. This new
approach builds on the research work of bible scholars, experimenting with new
hermeneutical approaches in which the local or global context is emphasized,
especially for the two-thirds world. Penner rightly observes, that “die meisten
osteuropäischen Versuche der missiologischen Arbeit mit dem biblischen Text
gehen leider noch nicht über die bereits vorliegenden westeuropäischen oder
nordamerikanischen Vorbilder hinaus und blicken nur gelegentlich auf Arbeiten
aus der Zwei-Drittel-Welt.“ (pg. 5)
In the light of these developments the central
question of Penner in this habilitation thesis is clearly stated as not to
develop a biblical mission theology, a missional hermeneutic: to assess “inwieweit
eigentlich eine missionale hermeneutic notwendig ist, … um dem biblischen Text gerecht zu werden, der im Missionskontext
geschrieben und an eine missionale Gemeinschaft adressiert wurde.“ (pg. 6).
Penner is thorough in his analysis and
balanced, fair and honest in his evaluations, e.g. as he states that the church
of the Reformation “verpasste
es auf die missionale Stimme des biblischen Textes zu hören” (pg. 156). It is important that throughout
his study he keeps the focus on both the role of individual and of the
community in God’s mission, which connects a strong “evangelical” focus on the
individual and an ecumenical focus on community.
Peter Penner defines missiology as the discipline
which earlier was called mission theology and in the Middle Ages still was
referred to as propaganda fidei as “lebendig und muss die christliche
Botschaft dem Kontext gemäß abwandeln, ohne dabei das Evangelium prinzipiell zu
verändern.” (pg. 29) He
attempts to clarify the concept of mission by dealing with a number of related
concepts in the New Testament which could clarify its meaning. However, the concept “missional” is not
clarified. Sometimes mission theology and missiology are used as synonyms, sometimes
as differing from each other. The use of
the term “Osteuropa” seems to lacks consistency. Sometimes it is used in the
political way of the former “Ostblock”, sometimes in a geographical way as part
of Central and Eastern Europe.
2.
Originality,
actuality and significance of the thesis
With his habilitation thesis Dr. Peter F.
Penner offers an important contribution to the field of missiology in that he
provides a corrective to the so called managerial missiology, the pragmatic,
result-oriented missiology, which has a weak biblical foundation. These tendencies
are also present in Central and Eastern Europe (pg. 182). His emphasis on the involvement of the
missional community in the missio Dei “weitet sich der Horizont der Einzelnen
und der Gemeinschaft und relativiert sich der eigene Anspruch in der eigenen
Sache der Mission, ohne dabei die Absolute Gottes zu relativieren“ (pg.
178).
The significance of the thesis lays also in the
fact that his approach to dialogue with text oriented hermeneutical approaches
as the historical-critical method and with social hermeneutic approaches as the
liberation theology with the purpose to assess how these can be used for a
missional hermeneutic, opens new avenues of interaction between missiologists and
biblical scholars.
The fact that Penner seeks to introduce the
discussion on the missional hermeneutic in the academic discourse of biblical
scholars and missiologists of Central and Eastern Europe is important for the
role of the churches in the post-communist societies society. Penner
convincingly shows how important this approach is for developing a relevant
contextual theology for a post-communist context as he deals with the themes of
poverty and richness (Pg. 106ff, 145, 146 and 149), reconciliation and Vergangenheitsbewältigung (pg. 143), but also with the responsibility of individual and
community in God’s mission and the role of the Holy Spirit.
The candidate shows academic courage in
addressing sensitive and important issues like the problem of social injustice
and the call for an orthopraxis in relation to solidarity with the poor! He also displays academic modesty as he does
not present final conclusions but invites both biblical scholars and
missiologists to enter into the discussion on developing a missional
hermeneutic, which is “weniger eine Methode, vielmehr geht es darum die
Intention, die der Text tragt, herauszustellen und sie bei der Interpretation
einzelner Abschnitte nicht zu vergessen. Eine solche Weise des Lesens des Biblischen Text wird nicht nur die Exegese
bestimmen, sonder auch die darauf bauende Theologie und durchdringt damit alle
Bereiche der akademischen theologischen Arbeit! (pg. 179). The candidate thus manages to link
theory and mission praxis in a dynamic way.
This study into the need for a missional
hermeneutic is also significant for the Post-Christianum discussion in
missiology as it sheds new light on the life of the early Church and on what it
means to be a minority church instead of a majority church.
Penner thus makes an original contribution to
knowledge in its field which is suitable for publication
3. Structure of the thesis
The task Penner sets himself to do in a clearly
structured manner is to prove the thesis of the necessity of a missional
hermeneutic (pg 7).
In the first chapter he deals with the
historical–critical method, as a hermeneutic to build on, but which method he
expands through a “missional” interpretation using keywords of the Acts of the
Apostles in order to define the concept of mission and their field of meaning.
In the second chapter he questions the
liberation theology hermeneutic as a representative of a social hermeneutic
whether it contains useful elements for a better interpretation of the biblical
text and whether in this way it could be part of a missional hermeneutic. He
focuses on the theme of salvation for the poor which plays an important role in
the liberation theology, using again texts of the Acts of the Apostles. Then he
deals with the theme of holistic peace in order look into the question of
contextuality in liberation theology, using a case study of evangelical groups
in the former CIS and their wrestling with their context and identify in
relation to peace service.
In the third chapter of his thesis Penner deals
with a synthesis of the historical critical method and a missional hermeneutic
taking into consideration the social hermeneutic, especially that of liberation
theology (pg. 8). He convincingly proves “dass der biblische Text selbst von der
Mission Gottes und der Metaerzählung erzählt, dass der Text missional ist, weil
er zur Mission anspornt”. In this chapter he studies the meaning of the Holy Spirit in Acts as the
Spirit of mission as well as the mission prayer of the messianic community and
the Jerusalem council. It is remarkable that Old Testament texts are
interpreted in a missional way and thus become a model for the readers. He deals thus with the missional hermeneutic
in the context of the missiological discussions on the biblical text (pg.
7).
In this study Penner seeks not only to bring
missiology and the biblical sciences together in an interdisciplinary way, but
also to present and introduce a discussion in Central and Eastern Europe in and
in continental Europe which till now had been limited to the Anglo-American
context (pg. 9). Since the concept of mission and the approach to the biblical
text in Central and Eastern Europe is often different, new contextual impulses
and unique contributions from this region could be given to the discussion on
developing a missional hermeneutic elsewhere.
4.
Literature
The candidate demonstrates a thorough knowledge
of literature relevant to its subject and general field. He also shows an ability
to exercise critical and analytical judgement of that literature.
The candidate consistently follows the path he
sets out to do, thoroughly analysing and comparing and entering in debate with
a wide variety of German and English sources of different continents and
Christian traditions which shows clearly how he is at home in this subject. He
is as much aware of the ongoing debate in the Gospel and Our Culture Network
with scholars like George Hunsberger and Darrell Guder as he is of the
discourse in the BISAM study group of the International Association of Mission
Studies. With an academic openness combined with great diligence and German Gründlichkeit he fulfils this task.
At the same time he does not hide his own
position and bias, drawing the reader in a gentle but sometimes provocative way
into the discussions, offering a wealth of material for further study in the
well documented footnotes, which wets the appetite for entering deeper into the
discussion. At the same time he succeeds
in keeping his study focused, making clear his decisions on the choices he had
made in limiting his thesis.
Although it is not the main focus of his study,
it is a pity that not more sources are used to illustrate the relationship to
and the contextualization of the study into the Central and Eastern European
context. Obviously, the task ahead for scholars of Central and Eastern Europe
is to translate the discussion on the missional hermeneutic into their own
context, and to relate it to their own biblical and missiological discourses in
the vernacular.
5. Methodologies
This study displays a mastery of appropriate
methodology and theoretical material and the ability to communicate this
complex field in clear way to its readers.
Its interdisciplinary method extends to both the biblical sciences and
missiology. Throughout the methodology used is made explicit, like e.g. words
studies used to define the concept of mission show that the instruments and the
approach of the historical-critical method is helpful and necessary, but also
the limitations of a certain methodology are presented clearly (pg 40).
6. Publication
The thesis is worthy of being the basis of a
publication, not only in German, but also in English, and Hungarian and in some
of the local languages of Central and Eastern Europe.
Some minor corrections
are needed:
pg. 158:
David Bosch, Transforming Mission is
published not in 1992 but in 1991.
pg. 180: 2nd
par: The local perspective seems to disappear, only the regional and global remain.
passim:
Stász J. should be: Szász J.
passim: Szegények
mindig lesznek valetek should be …………veletek.
7. Conduct and Presentation
The present study meets internationally
recognized standards for the conduct and presentation of research in its field.
The formal presentation can be considered as an excellent model. The references
are always exact. The thesis is written in a good and readable style, and has a
clear structure, closing each chapter and thematic treatment with a clear
summary. He clearly manages throughout to show that the academic discourse he
embarked on is of great relevance for the praxis of mission, without falling
into pragmatism. Moreover, he succeeds in shedding new, fresh and sometimes
surprising light on well-known passages through the method he employs. He also
succeeds to keep the attention of the reader when he maps out what may be
unknown territory to him or her.
8. Remarks, comments and questions
1.
The
title of the study is formulated in a rather general way: “Missionale Hermeneutik: biblische
Texte kontextuell und relevant lesen“ whereas throughout the texts and
illustrations are taken from the books of Acts. It is stated that the method
can be extended to other books of the Bible. How could a missional hermeneutic
be applied to the reading of an OT book like Leviticus or a NT book like
Hebrews?
2.
As
Stephen Neill supposedly stated: “when everything is mission, nothing is
mission”. On pg. 230 the candidate
states in relation to the challenge of a dialogue on the missional hermeneutic
that it can serve to overcome the crisis in mission theology and praxis but
also in the biblical hermeneutic. “Dabei besteht die Gefahr, Mission so allumfassen zu präsentieren, dass sie
sich am Ende ganz verliert, oder ihr aber einengend eine geschützte Nische
zuzuweisen, in der es vor allem um die pragmatische Praxis der Mission geht.
Beides wäre fatal nicht nur für die Mission der Kirche, sondern auch für die
gesamte Theologie als Wissenschaft.“ In what way could this danger be avoided in a situation where the
concept of mission is already very broad, and almost identical to all
activities in the church?
3.
The
explicit intend of this study is to initiate a discussion on developing a
missional hermeneutic in Central and Eastern Europe. When the candidate would
be asked to design a research project with scholars from different Christian
traditions and different countries in this region, with what three main issues
would he start? How to go about setting up such a research project in a
situation where divisions even within Christian traditions are so sharp. How would he explain the relevance of this
project to the churches in order for them to support and bless this project?
On the basis of the above
assessment I recommend the thesis to be accepted and to allow the candidate to proceed
to the public lectures.
Budapest, 18th
February 2012.
Prof.
Dr. habil Anne-Marie Kool
Central and
Eastern European Institute for Mission Studies
of the
Károli Gáspár University in the Reformed Church.
Thursday, November 25, 2010
Tuesday, October 26, 2010
International Orthodox Mission Network Conference in Veliko Tarnovo
From Oct. 20-24, 2010 the International Orthodox Mission Network held its second conference in Veliko Tarnovo, Bulgaria. The first one took place in February in Minsk, Belarus. It was hosted by the Holy Metropolia of Veliko Tarnovo. One of the main organisers of the event was Miss Olga Oleink from Minsk, Belarus. The Central and Eastern European Institute for Mission Studies and the Central and Eastern European Association for Mission Studies was represented by Mrs. Nóra Sümegi, a graduate from the Faculty of Divinity of the Károli Reformed University in Budapest, a member of Wycliffe Bible Translators.
International Orthodox Mission Network Veliko Tarnovo Oct. 2010 Bg Patriarshia Website Info Eng
International Orthodox Mission Network Veliko Tarnovo Oct. 2010 Bg Patriarshia Website Info Eng
Wednesday, June 16, 2010
Untimely death of Dr. Davorin Peterlin
With great sadness, and a feeling of "this cannot be true", I received the news of the untimely death of a dear friend and colleague of ours, Dr. Davorin Peterlin, Professor of Early Christianity and History of Minority Religious Groups, Head of the Research Department and Academic Resources Officer at the Evangelical Theological Faculty in Osijek, Croatia, died at the age of 51, on the 14th of June, 2010, in Zagreb, Croatia.
I just called Prof. Dr. Peter Kuzmic, the President of the Evangelical Theological Faculty in Osijek, Croatia, to express my condoleances. Dr. Kuzmic, a lifelong friend of Prof. Peterlin stated: ‘The unexpected passing of Prof. Davorin Peterlin is a great shock to all of us his friends and colleagues. To use a biblical metaphor, death came to him as a thief in the night – unexpected, unwanted and unwelcomed. It robbed him of a life full of anticipation, research and writing, teaching and mentoring. Davorin was an effective leader, a constructive team player and a scholar who had the capacity to think critically and comparatively. The academic community at the Evangelical Theological Faculty will miss him greatly for we were all convinced that along with all of his many accomplishments his best work still lay ahead of him’.
Davor died of a massive heart attack, just a week after he remarried.
For the first time I met Davor in 1985 in the Netherlands at an IFES conference on evangelism, and since then many many times. I greatly respect him as friend, as a colleague, as a scholar. I have no words to express my grief, and with you I pray that our Lord will comfort his wife, his children, and those who have been working so closely with him ont he ETS staff.
In the sudden passing away of Dr. Peterlin, we are all reminded of the fragility of our lives, that this life is „just a passing through”, „shadow lands” (C.S. Lewis) and to live each day with a view to eternity and to set our priorities from that perspective.
The funeral service will be held on the 17th of June at 10 AM at the Zagreb Crematorium, in Zagreb, Croatia. A Memorial Service will take place in Osijek at the Evangelical Theological Faculty on the 24th of June at 11 AM.
Read obituary of ETS: http://www.scribd.com/full/33131956?access_key=key-2i078ursns6kn1zjucoo
I just called Prof. Dr. Peter Kuzmic, the President of the Evangelical Theological Faculty in Osijek, Croatia, to express my condoleances. Dr. Kuzmic, a lifelong friend of Prof. Peterlin stated: ‘The unexpected passing of Prof. Davorin Peterlin is a great shock to all of us his friends and colleagues. To use a biblical metaphor, death came to him as a thief in the night – unexpected, unwanted and unwelcomed. It robbed him of a life full of anticipation, research and writing, teaching and mentoring. Davorin was an effective leader, a constructive team player and a scholar who had the capacity to think critically and comparatively. The academic community at the Evangelical Theological Faculty will miss him greatly for we were all convinced that along with all of his many accomplishments his best work still lay ahead of him’.
Davor died of a massive heart attack, just a week after he remarried.
For the first time I met Davor in 1985 in the Netherlands at an IFES conference on evangelism, and since then many many times. I greatly respect him as friend, as a colleague, as a scholar. I have no words to express my grief, and with you I pray that our Lord will comfort his wife, his children, and those who have been working so closely with him ont he ETS staff.
In the sudden passing away of Dr. Peterlin, we are all reminded of the fragility of our lives, that this life is „just a passing through”, „shadow lands” (C.S. Lewis) and to live each day with a view to eternity and to set our priorities from that perspective.
The funeral service will be held on the 17th of June at 10 AM at the Zagreb Crematorium, in Zagreb, Croatia. A Memorial Service will take place in Osijek at the Evangelical Theological Faculty on the 24th of June at 11 AM.
Read obituary of ETS: http://www.scribd.com/full/33131956?access_key=key-2i078ursns6kn1zjucoo
Monday, February 8, 2010
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
.jpg)

